Why Aren’t There More Union Members in America? A Reply to Will Wilkinson

21 Jul

Will Wilkinson is awfully confident that the labor movement doesn’t have a future in America because…Americans don’t want it to have a future in America.

Now, if you ask me, the combination of continually increasing global competitiveness and the peculiarly individualistic tenor of American public opinion makes the prospect of revitalising organised labour exceedingly unlikely. Organised labour still has plenty of fight in it, and no doubt it will win some important battles in the coming months and years. But the war is long lost, I’m afraid. No matter how hard the left claps for Tinkerbell Local #272, she’s not getting up.

Well, I didn’t ask him, but he did ask me.  In a Twitter exchange, where I said to him that union-busting has a lot to do with the past, present, and future of the labor movement in America. Wilkinson asked for cites; I gave him one and then told him to email me if he wanted more.  He didn’t.  So I’ll provide them here.

But first let’s remember a few things.

1.  Polls shows that a majority of non-managerial workers want to be represented by a union.  Richard Freeman, the Harvard economist who’s studied this issue more than anyone else, shows that in 2005, 53 percent of those workers, if given the opportunity, would have voted for union representation in a union election.  That, he argues, would have produced a unionization rate of 58 percent.

So why is the unionization rate more like 12 percent and decreasing everyday?

2.  Employers rely on a highly sophisticated “union-avoidance” industry to make sure those workers don’t get their unions.  Union-busters try to stop elections from being held.  If elections are held, they try to make sure—through threats, intimidation, and other illegal means—workers don’t vote for the union. If workers make it clear that they will vote for the union, they get fired, harassed, demoted, and so on.  Gordon Lafer, the University of Oregon political scientist who is one of the leading experts on union elections, estimates that 1 in 17 of every eligible voter in a union election gets illegally fired or suspended for his or her support for a union.  And, of course, the ramifications of those individual incidents extend far beyond the worker or even the workplace: when they see what happens to one pro-union worker, other workers (or workers in other workplaces) aren’t likely to step up or speak out in support of a union.

3.  Even when employers don’t break the law, election campaigns are overwhelmingly stacked against unions. Union election campaigns that are run according to the letter of the law, Lafer demonstrates, are more like the kinds of elections we used to see in the Soviet Union, and certainly don’t conform to the election standards the United States claims to uphold around the world.

4.  More generally, labor law excludes about a quarter of the American workforce, rendering many workers ineligible for union representation.  As the authors of this report argue:

There are 140.5 million people in the civilian workforce. Our research found that of these employees, 33.5 million, or 23.8%, have no rights under the NLRA or any other labor law: no legally-protected right to join or form a union, no legally-protected right to bargain collectively for their wages and conditions of work, and therefore, effectively no freedom of association in the workplace.

Now, it could be that Americans in their heart of hearts don’t really want unions, that they’re the individualists  everyone from Will Wilkinson to Will Wilkinson thinks they are.  (Okay, that was unfair: lots of smart people, like Louis Hartz, make the same mistake as Wilkinson.)  But until American workers are given an opportunity to register what they think on these matters, in the workplace but absent coercion and intimidation, I’ll take a pass on what Will Wilkinson thinks on these matters.

I don’t mean to be dismissive of Wilkinson; he’s a smart and charming fellow. (Our little Twitter exchange prompted my clearly delighted 3-year-old daughter to run around the apartment shouting, “Why is Will Wilkinson tweeting?  Why is Will Wilkinson tweeting?”) It’s just that there’s a vast body of research out there—and really smart people like Lafer, Freeman, Kate Bronfenbrenner, Dorian Warren, and others—that Wilkinson might want to consult before he speculates any further on the inner recesses of the American mind.

If you’re interested in reading more about all this, check out these sources:

http://www.americanrightsatwork.org/dmdocuments/ARAWReports/NeitherFreeNorFair.pdf

http://www.americanrightsatwork.org/dmdocuments/ARAWReports/FreeandFair%20FINAL.pdf

http://www.americanrightsatwork.org/dmdocuments/ARAWReports/havesandhavenots_nlracoverage.pdf

http://www.americanrightsatwork.org/dmdocuments/ARAWReports/noholdsbarred.pdf

http://www.sharedprosperity.org/bp182/bp182.pdf

http://www.rooseveltinstitute.org/sites/all/files/working_paper_cover_2011-01-final.pdf

http://www.hrw.org/legacy/reports/2000/uslabor/

Paul Weiler, Governing the Workplace (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990)

Richard Freeman and Joel Rogers, What Workers Want (Ithaca: ILR Press, 1999) [there may be a later edition of this]

Corey Robin, Fear: The History of a Political Idea (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), ch. 8

 

Update (2:30 pm)

While I was working on this post, I got an email from Wilkinson asking me for the cites I had tweeted him about. I didn’t see the email before this post went live, so wanted to correct the record here.  Note to self: check your email before you get splenetic. At least on the interwebs.

15 Responses to “Why Aren’t There More Union Members in America? A Reply to Will Wilkinson”

  1. Jon July 21, 2011 at 2:13 pm #

    Since we are with the assumption that “continually increasing global competitiveness” is a fundamental law of nature which cannot be altered, it might be useful to look at countries with large current account surpluses and see if it is incompatible with a strongly unionized labor force, as Wilkinson suggests.

    Let’s see: 5 out of the top 10 countries with the largest trade surpluses (Japan, Germany, Norway, Switzerland, and the Netherlands) all have unionization rates nearly twice that of the United States. China, of course, has the largest surplus, but do we really want to be like China? If you look at account surplus as a percentage of GDP, you get the same picture.

    Leaving aside the obsession with trade and increasing our “global competitiveness” (almost always accomplished by reducing wages rather than increasing innovation) despite relatively small contribution to GDP, it seems that both parts of Wilkinson’s argument don’t hold much water.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Sunday Reading « zunguzungu - July 24, 2011

    […] Why there aren’t more union members in the US. Also, some labor links. […]

  2. The Economic Cure That Dare Not Speak Its Name « Corey Robin - August 7, 2011

    […] Polls show that about 40 million non-union workers wish they had a union at work.  Whatever the right may say about the culture of individualism, the truth is that Americans still want collective power in the […]

  3. If Everybody’s Working for the Weekend, How Come It Took This Country So Goddamn Long to Get One? « Corey Robin - September 18, 2011

    […] them are obvious: the money power on the right; the barriers against union organizing, about which I’ve written; the corporate funding base for non-profits that is hostile to campaigns for economic democracy; […]

  4. The Decline of the Populist Left and the Rise of the Tea Party - Forbes - September 26, 2011

    […] are the social politics of the New Left enough. With the growing divide in wealth, the decline of organized labor, and starve-the-beast politics hitting everything from Medicaid to public schools, a renewed focus […]

  5. The Decline of the Populist Left and the Rise of the Tea Party - September 27, 2011

    […] are the social politics of the New Left enough. With the growing divide in wealth, the decline of organized labor, and starve-the-beast politics hitting everything from Medicaid to public schools, a renewed focus […]

  6. The Occupy Crackdowns: Why Naomi Wolf Got It Wrong « Corey Robin - November 29, 2011

    […] and The Economist, which ran two blog posts, one of them from Will Wilkinson, with whom we’ve tangled and talked before. The Guardian did a round-up of responses to the Wolf piece, and included it there.  3 Quarks […]

  7. Fight Club, or That’s the Year That Was « Corey Robin - December 26, 2011

    […] it has remained an abiding theme of this blog, generating some further arguments with people like Will Wilkinson and friendly exchanges with friends like Mike […]

  8. Check out BC pol sci prof Corey Robin’s blog | Brooklyn College MA in Political Science and International Affairs - December 29, 2011

    […] it has remained an abiding theme of this blog, generating some further arguments with people like Will Wilkinson and friendly exchanges with friends like Mike […]

  9. Privatization Kills Freedom « Civil Tongue - July 2, 2012

    […] be punished for doing or not doing any of these things—punished legally or illegally (as many as 1 in 17 workers who try to join a union is illegally fired or suspended). But what’s remarkable is just how many of these punishments are legal, and even when they’re […]

  10. Matt Yglesias’ China Syndrome « Corey Robin - September 24, 2012

    […] what about labor activism? Matt is right, of course, about the repressive Chinese state. But as I’ve long argued, a good deal of worker activism in the United States also gets repressed. One in 17 of every […]

  11. You Have No Rights at Work | Jake Blumgart - October 19, 2012

    […] for doing or not doing any of these things—punished legally or illegally (as many as 1 in 17 workers who try to join a union is illegally fired or suspended). But what’s remarkable is just how many of these punishments are legal, and even when they’re […]

  12. Oppose a Straussian: Support the Workers at Pomona College | Corey Robin - March 16, 2013

    […] unions, check out this landmark study from Human Rights Watch. Additional studies can be found here, and here, and here. These will give some context for why unions are increasingly asking employers […]

  13. Faculty Privacy | Savage Minds Backup - June 2, 2013

    […] punished for doing or not doing any of these things—punished legally or illegally (as many as 1 in 17 workers who try to join a union is illegally fired or suspended). But what’s remarkable is just how many of these punishments are legal, and even when […]

  14. Labor Day Readings | Corey Robin - September 1, 2014

    […] be punished for doing or not doing any of these things—punished legally or illegally (as many as 1 in 17 workers who try to join a union is illegally fired or suspended). But what’s remarkable is just how many of these punishments are legal, and even when they’re […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 6,678 other followers