Kafka Comes to CUNY

Three days ago, the New York Post reported that Hunter College was looking to hire a scholar in Palestinian Studies. The job ad read:

We seek a historically grounded scholar who takes a critical lens to issues pertaining to Palestine including but not limited to: settler colonialism, genocide, human rights, apartheid, migration, climate and infrastructure devastation, health, race, gender, and sexuality.

It took less than a New York minute for Governor Hochul to order the job listing taken down and for CUNY leaders to comply. According to Hochul’s office, “Hateful rhetoric of any kind has no place at CUNY or anywhere in New York State.” The hateful rhetoric in question? These words and phrases: “settler colonialism,” “genocide,” and “apartheid.”

If a scholar studying these historical phenomena cannot be hired at CUNY, if a job advertisement mentioning these historical phenomena cannot be posted at CUNY, it’s safe to say that it probably won’t be long before any course examining these phenomena cannot be taught at CUNY.

Let’s be clear about what this means. First, any Palestinian voices and history mentioning these phenomena would be taken out of the curriculum. Second, any anti-Zionist Jewish voices and history mentioning these phenomena would be taken out of the curriculum. And, third, any Jewish Zionist or pro-Israel voices and history that mention these phenomena would be taken out of the curriculum.

Let me give you a concrete example.

My wife’s grandparents were refugees from Nazi Germany who fled to the United States in the 1930s. After they died, my wife went through the trove of Judaica they had kept in their possession, some of which my wife now has. One book in their library stands out: An original edition of A Palestine Picture Book, published by Schocken in 1947, featuring photographs by Jakob Rosner for the Jewish National Fund.

The book has stunning photographs of Palestine, pre-1947.

It also has stunning text. Here are some example:

1. “It is barely forty years since the large-scale Jewish colonization of Palestine was begun. Despite natural and political handicaps, Jewish colonization, once begun, continued.”

2. “Long a barren waste, it has been transformed by Jewish settlers into a place of fertile fields and green gardens in a generation’s time.”

3. “Orange plantations now cover thousands of acres of the once water-starved coastal plain in dramatic contrast with the parched tracts of soil where colonization has not yet begun.”

4. “From Lake Chinnereth the Jordan flows through a wide valley studded with new and thriving Jewish settlements.”

5. “They have devoted their life and labor to the one aim of developing their settlements into strong and efficient units. Many of the new agricultural colonies are either.”

6. “…and landscaped prospects of the permanent settlement….All collective settlements…The fully developed settlements…the collective settlements…Some settlements…especially settlements…A number of settlements…brought upon a settlement…fathers and mothers of the young settlers, left Europe to join the settlements…When a settlement is founded…in every settlement…reproduces the work of the settlement…”

Virtually every page is a reference to colonies, colonists, settlers, and settlements. Put the words together, and what do you get? A concept and a text, written by Jews, that Governor Hochul, the leaders of CUNY, and the leaders of Hunter College have decided is hateful rhetoric that has no place at CUNY.

Please grasp the irony: In the name of protecting Jews against anti-Semitism, we would have the governor of New York and the chancellor of CUNY, neither of whom is Jewish, prohibiting the teaching of a Jewish text, written by Jews, published by Jews, featuring photographs taken by Jews for the Jewish National Fund, owned by my wife’s Jewish refugee grandparents, now owned by my Jewish wife.

The words censorship and academic freedom and McCarthyism and authoritarianism don’t even begin to describe the reality of what we’d be facing here: Jewish texts banned by non-Jews in the name of the Jews. It’s like a fable out of Kafka or a short story by Babel or a novella by Roth. I’d suggest we adopt one of those readings instead, but perhaps it won’t be too long before they would be banned, too.


Discover more from Corey Robin

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

6 Comments

  1. Howard | #

    The tone you struck on Zionism landed far from the Aristotelian mean, if indeed such a stance is stable and likely to last. The original Zionists fell victim to the “justice” of Mufti and mobs well before it was a full fledged colonial project. Were those massacres the offspring of Palestinian clarovoiance? For two thousand years we were strangers in a strange land and unarmed and defenseless behind enemy lines, which resulted in the welter and waste of the Shoah, which was a crime against Jews as much as against humanity. It is good for you to critique Jewish nationalism, I’m agreed Israel has gone too far and I’ve thought about it as much as you have; but the justice you seek for the Palestinians is not an abstract justice but rather a Jihadi justice. I get that the suicide bombers were merely inflicting justice against the “occupiers” for I have an open mind and one that is not one that is not linked to an ideologically maimed pen as is yours. You condemn Zionist “settler colonialism” but do you condemn Muslim Imperialism too? I’m talking about the Jihadism that Chris Hitchens (no friend of Israel) railed against. In the Cairo Trilogy the protaginist who is a wealthy merchant has a wife who is holed up in the night in a bedroom full of demons and she tells them and I paraphrase, “we are Muslims and we are not afraid of you.” Muslims have similar values to Jews and I honor that, they are not Christians and they are not Amalek and they are not Nazis, but they have an Imperialism like any and if you have your way what will you say about what would be the latest and last massacre of Zion? Would you celebrate as on Purim or Passover or will you mourn as on Tish B Av?

  2. Glenn | #

    Steven Salaita successfully sued U of I for retraction of offer after he resigned previous employment. At last information he is now driving a school bus.

    His “crime” was support for Palestinian rights.

  3. Glenn | #

    The University of Illinois faced a lawsuit from professor Steven Salaita after they rescinded his job offer due to his controversial social media posts about Israel. The university ultimately settled the lawsuit for $875,000, but Salaita will not be reinstated or allowed to teach there.

  4. Gary Ostroff | #

    Zionist complain that they are held to a double standard. They are! It’s okay to criticize Palestinians, but not okay to criticize Israel.

  5. Mike | #

    The problem with the ad is that it is clearly seeking someone with specific political views. Suppose the ad had read, “We seek a scholar of the Arab-Israeli conflict who will focus on terrorism, Islamic extremism and antisemitism”? Wouldn’t that be a bit biased?

  6. Emily | #

    I am disturbed by the manner in which government officials are pursuing control of the humanities in public colleges and universities as my own loyalties generally lay with professors (of which I am one) over politicians. As these institutions are partially funded by taxpayer dollars, oversight is to be expected. Unfortunately, the professoriate in the humanities have narrowed the ideological viewpoints acceptable in their fields to such an extreme that it will be difficult to get the average citizen taxpayer to be alarmed when steps are taken to correct this intellectual monopoly. While I would not call the job listing “hateful rhetoric”, I would call it insular, illiberal, pandering to extreme left-wing political ideology, and obviously open to one and only one possible perspective. Academics in the humanities might apply the same challenging logic to their department’s intellectual diversity as you apply to your critique of Hochul’s directive: stop the censorship and allow academic freedom.

Leave a Reply