What we do when we talk about teaching

In the face of a spate of executive orders about education and what we can and cannot teach about the United States, particularly with regard to race, I’m posting here the course description for my American Political Theory class that I’m teaching this term.

It’s high time that those of us, particularly with tenure, who teach American history or American politics or American political thought or anything in that realm, stand up and speak out on behalf of what we teach. Not in a defensive or apologetic crouch, but proudly and loudly, affirming that we offer students an in-depth approach to central problems of the American experience.

My course opens with readings from Aristotle and the Hebrew Bible on slavery, and from Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton on capitalism (and slavery). I feel absolutely confident and certain that I am asking my students to faithfully and intelligently reckon with central currents of the American experience, with foundational questions of freedom and democracy, markets and liberty, personhood and property.

If you want to know what it is that we teachers do in our classroom, here it is:

This course will take up two elements of the American experience: slavery and capitalism. How do these institutions—one ancient, the other modern—relate, reinforce, and/or undermine each other? Through writings from the American canon—from Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton to W.E.B. Du Bois and Frederick Douglass—and contemporary scholarship in history and the social sciences, we’ll examine how slavery, which many thought doomed to extinction at the founding of the American republic, grew and expanded as the United States developed into a more egalitarian democracy in the nineteenth century. We’ll look at how political writers and thinkers grew increasingly committed to slavery, and how they justified it as the foundation of democracy and capitalism. We’ll discuss the abolition of slavery, which generated one of the largest mass movements for emancipation across the world, and the effort to overturn that abolition under Jim Crow. Students should come away from this course with a better understanding of central political concepts such as freedom, labor, the market, racism, and domination—and how to apply those concepts in today’s world.


Discover more from Corey Robin

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

5 Comments

  1. sjf123 | #

    I’ve been thinking about this as well. I’m teaching courses in political rhetoric and propaganda (yes, propaganda!) and i have no problem in pointing out Trump’s propaganda, and I am thinking of writing something about teaching propaganda in the age of trump. Briefly, Trump and his administration follow religiously the Russian propaganda model, sometimes called the firehose model of propaganda — info on this is all over the internet — but Trump is really a master at this — and it shows, because our political analysts — those folks who work for the news agencies — are incredibly unequipped to deal with this, much less understand this — and call it for what it is.

  2. Jon | #

    I would welcome the list of readings/full syllabus as well! I am familiar with this narrative from secondary sources like Market Revolution (Charles Sellers) and Virgin Land (Henry Nash Smith) but would welcome primary sources, too.

  3. Ros Petchesky | #

    Well done Corey! This can be a model for others, never needed more. I’m sharing it with my close friend who is part of the SNCC Legacy group who will be meeting this weekend and thinking about exactly how to address this crisis in education – the urgency of preserving and teaching the actual history of the US.

  4. sophiesmith2014 | #

    Hi Corey, I hope you’ll also talk to your students about gender and American political theory — the women who wrote major interventions into the field, who criticised the men around them for the ways that they used theory as a mechanism of exclusion, who wrote histories of American political ideas that put women back in, and the black women in particular whose ideas and arguments about and for abolition were crucial, and remain so. Insisting on talking about these texts, about their impact, flair and innovation, is part, for me, of refusing to take a defensive posture at a time when DEI is being blamed for plane crashes.

  5. Dan | #

    What a great course. I wrote a historiographical essay back in grad school on the relationship between slavery and capitalism. An arc tracing Smith & Marx to Williams to the “new social history” to econometrics to the “new capitalism”. A worthwhile project.

Leave a Reply